View Comments

Play With The Toy, But Don’t Watch The Movie

By Crystal Arcand on December 17th, 2009

AvatarMcDonalds

“Crystal’s Soapbox,” published each Thursday, is a column by conservative Texas mom Crystal Arcand who loves to rant about issues that relate to her kids….and yours.

Can somebody explain to me why we have the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America)? I mean, if we’re going to totally undermine the movie rating system by shilling toys to toddlers that are tie-ins to PG-13 movies what’s the point? How do you justify marketing a toy to a three-years-old child that’s based on a movie that the child might get to see in a decade?

It all started with “Pirates of the Caribbean” for me. During a trip to the McDonald’s drive-through, I asked for a toddler toy for my youngest child, who was under three at the time. I expected a Fisher Price vehicle of some sort, as that was the usual under-three toy. Imagine my surprise to pull out a skeleton. And not just any skeleton – a glow-in-the-dark, “Pirates of the Caribbean”-branded skeleton. It was nowhere near Halloween, so it wasn’t that. It was the movie they were marketing to my toddler.

Wait. You mean to tell me that you actually expect me to give this toy to my child? First, I can’t believe someone somewhere actually had the idea to make a soft, stuffed skeleton. Does that seem just a little bit weird to anyone else out there? Second, how do you expect me to explain what it is to my child?

“Well, honey, there’s this movie…”

“Ooh! Can I see it?”

“Um, no.”

“Then how do I know what the guy is supposed to do?”

Did you hear that? That was my sigh as I plunked my head on the steering wheel.

So, I avoid McDonald’s. Problem solved. Until I get home and the television commercial entices my eight-year-old with the most awesome toy ever – a “Pirates of the Caribbean” play set, complete with Davy Jones. Try explaining that without letting them watching the movie.

Oh, and that movie “Avatar” that comes out Friday and is all over your local McDonalds right now? Yep, you guessed it. PG-13.

I propose that toy companies and fast food restaurants be prohibited from creating or marketing toys and products to children that are younger than the recommended age for seeing a movie. How’s that for some common sense?

  • DC Perry

    You’re implying that children under 13 aren’t allowed to see PG-13 movies. It’s certainly within your rights as a parent not to allow it, but that’s not on McDonalds’ radar; corporate profits are. If you object to the toys they sell with your children’s meals, shop elsewhere. If enough people agree, market forces will drive them to change.

  • Alex -s-

    YES! Big McDonalds fail here! Avatar toys to kids- i don’t know many 13yr old happy meal eaters.

    I even went to McDonalds site to complain, but when i saw their complaint form was a multi-field monstrosity (Seriously i have to give you my home address, and phone number, etc just to complain? Again fail!), i gave up on that.

    Oh – and a word of advice, don’t even waste your time trying to get a response from @mcdonalds on Twitter’ because that’s just a bandwagon jumping cool move they schlepped out to some hip marketing agency that never listens anyways ;)

    When you look at the usually successful toys they tie in with movies at McD’s – this one was an ill conceived cash in at best and blatant “we don’t care about anything but $$$” at worst.

  • Paul A

    yes, but then, how many parents take their kids to see movies that aren’t rated suitable for kids? when I went to the LOTR MARATHON – yes, not a single movie, but an almost 12hr marathon – there were kids there that weren’t old enough for school in a movie marathon that here in Australia is rated M15+

    I personally believe that they shouldn’t be able to sell tix to under-age movie-goers (and should be fined for doing so – like that would happen…).

blog comments powered by Disqus