View Comments

Embracing Gender: A Lesson For Parents

By Akela Talamasca on March 24th, 2010

In an interesting article entitled “My Name is Jesse”, by Jesse Ellison, the writer reveals her unusual upbringing as an “experiment” in gender neutrality. Apparently Jesse’s parents decided that it would be in her best interest to try to deprogram her natural inclination toward her gender-based proclivities. For example, they would dress her as neutrally as possible, let her only play with wooden blocks instead of dolls, etc. Unfortunately, the more she was pushed, the more Jesse would rebel, demanding dresses and the like; she wanted to be just who she was, and not a political statement.

Jesse’s mother says “It took a while to think, ‘Maybe men and women really are different from each other, and they’re both equally valuable.’ ” Contrary to what they expected, Jesse’s parents found that trying to even the playing field by refusing to acknowledge the inherent differences between the sexes simply exacerbated the issue. In fact, far from being an equalizer, such actions simply brought into greater relief the disparity already existent.

Any condemnation based on gender is simple intolerance. It’s up to the parents to foster acceptance by modeling it. This can be difficult, given that sexual discrimination still exists to varying degrees in most parts of our society. We want to tell our children that they can be anything they want to be when they grow up, and they can, but we need to also bear in mind that this is not an entirely just environment, and there is inequality. The best we can do is to lead by example — show fairness, respect the differences of others, pursue justice. If tomorrow’s adults grow up with these tenets in place, the charged political landscape might just change over time.

  • Pwll

    It seems to me you want a child to feel free to explore everything regardless of what gender those things are associated with. So a child should be allowed to wear whatever clothes they want, pants or skirts, play with whatever toys they want, dolls or blocks or trucks, etc. We shouldn’t limit childrens choices. I loved dolls, but I really wanted an electric train like my brother’s as well. Why couldn’t I have both?

  • Pwll

    Just to add another point, I’m a woman who wears mostly pants because they are the most comfortable, but I love to wear a flowy skirt when I dance. Why shouldn’t men have that opportunity as well?

  • Lyric Dane

    I think that this experiment essentially mimicked the way the gender binary tends to be treated. I.e., “You’re a girl, so you play with dolls,” and “You’re a boy so you play with action figures,” even though they really are just dolls with a different name, and anyone who is “supposed” to be a girl can’t play with them. If I were to have a child, I would raise em gender-freely. This is different from gender-neutral because it would give my child the chance to pick what clothes and toys that ey emself may want. Of course, in the beginning, I’ll have to choose, but once ey can make eir own decisions, I’ll facilitate every possibility (within budget). I feel like this leaves a child free to follow eir heart. If my child wanted to pretend to be Molly Pitcher (Revolutionary War character), even though ey had a penis, and no vagina, I think that would be all fine and dandy. This allows my child to express emself, and to identify as whatever gender ey may choose. It eliminates the strict boxes into which we are supposed to fit based on our genitals as seen by some doctor. Why should our genitals have anything to do with what we wear (aside from accommodations for body shape and secondary sex traits)? Unlike a lot of people I hear about, I don’t want a “boy” or a “girl,” I just want a “child.”

    [Note: I want one in maybe 10 years, as I am only 16. I do not want to be a teen parent. I'm dealing with enough issues now, quite a few relating to gender. Imagine how f*cked up I'd be with all those female hormones!]

blog comments powered by Disqus