View Comments

Amanda Knox Parents Indicted in Italy for Times of London Interview

By Bridget Tyler on February 17th, 2011

Amanda Knox, the young American woman whose Italian murder trial has caught the imagination of the international media, faces twenty six years in prison for her alleged participation in the murder of her roommate if her appeals are not successful.  Now her parents are facing charges of defamation against the Italian courts for statements made in an interview with the Sunday Times of London, according to the Italian wire service ANSA. The indictment claims that Knox’s parents falsely claimed in the interview that their daughter “had not been given an interpreter, had not received food and water and had been physically and verbally abused.”  It also maintains that the Knox’s claims that Knox was ”hit by a cuff behind the head” and “threatened (that) if you ask for a lawyer things will get worse for you” are untrue.

Italian libel laws are notoriously tough, and the courts there try about 1,000 cases of libel a year, apparently.  Knox herself is also facing defamation charges because of her testimony, apparently.  Knox’s appeal will begin in the Spring, and various experts, including retired FBI Agent Steve Moore, who once believed her guilty, are finding a lot of holes in the case.

“When Amanda Knox gets out, if she needs a roommate, I’ll send my daughter over,” retired FBI Special Agent Steve Moore told Good Morning America. “The evidence is completely conclusive.”

Moore started investigating to settle a bet with his wife.  The more he looks, the more he feels that the girl is innocent.  ”There is no DNA evidence. What they’re saying is that whoever killed Meredith cleaned up in Amanda’s bathroom. That’s all they say,” Moore said. “They found Amanda’s DNA in her own bathroom? Astounding.”

“They were doing unsound forensic techniques that lead to cross contamination. Their techniques were horrible,” he said, commenting on a tape of the crime scene being investigated. “If you showed that video tape in American court you would have lost more of your evidence.”

Amanda’s appeal will go forward this spring, and her parent’s defamation trial will be held in Perugia on July 6, according to ANSA.

  • http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php Harry Rag

    The evidence against Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito is overwhelming. They gave completely different accounts of where they were, who they were with and what they were doing on the night of the murder. Neither Knox nor Sollecito have credible alibis despite three attempts each. All the other people who were questioned had one credible alibi that could be verified. Innocent people don’t give multiple conflicting alibis and lie repeatedly to the police. 

    The DNA didn’t miraculously deposit itself in the most incriminating of places. 

    An abundant amount of Raffaele Sollecito’s DNA was found on Meredith’s bra clasp. His DNA was identified by two separate DNA tests. Of the 17 loci tested in the sample, Sollecito’s profile matched 17 out of 17.

    According to Sollecito’s forensic expert, Professor Vinci, Knox’s DNA was on Meredith’s bra. 

    Amanda Knox’s DNA was found on the handle of the double DNA knife and a number of independent forensic experts – Dr. Patrizia Stefanoni, Dr. Renato Biondo and Professor Francesca Torricelli – categorically stated that Meredith’s DNA was on the blade. Sollecito knew that Meredith’s DNA was on the blade which is why he twice lied about accidentally pricking her hand whilst cooking.

    There were five instances of Knox’s DNA mixed with Meredith’s blood in three different locations in the cottage.

    Knox tracked Meredith’s blood into the bathroom, the hallway, her room and Filomena’s room, where the break-in was staged. Knox’s DNA and Meredith’s blood was found mixed together in Filomena’s room, in a bare bloody footprint in the hallway and in three places in the bathroom. 

    Rudy Guede’s bloody footprints led straight out of Meredith’s room and out of the house. This means that he didn’t stage the break-in in Filomena’s room or go into the blood-spattered bathroom after Meredith had been stabbed.

    The bloody footprint on the blue bathmat in the bathroom matched the precise characteristics of Sollecito’s foot, but couldn’t possibly belong to Guede. Knox’s and Sollecito’s bare bloody footprints were revealed by luminol in the hallway. 

    It’s not a coincidence that the three people – Knox, Sollecito and Guede – who kept telling the police a pack of lies are all implicated by the DNA and forensic evidence.

    Amanda Knox voluntarily admitted that she was involved in Meredith’s murder in her handwritten note to the police on 6 November 2007. After she was informed that Sollecito was no longer providing her with an alibi, she stated on at least four separate occasions that she was at the cottage when Meredith was killed. At the trial, Sollecito refused to corroborate Knox’s alibi that she was at his apartment.

    Knox accused an innocent man, Diya Lumumba, of murdering Meredith despite the fact she knew he was completely innocent. She didn’t recant her false and malicious allegation against Lumumba the whole time he was in prison. She admitted that it was her fault that Lumumba was in prison in an intercepted conversation with her mother on 10 November 2007.

  • longchamp sale

    Transfer from Fifth Avenue   KELLAND reviews: Paris, like a typical woman, except I installed lipstick and   wallet handbag, my hands and ultimately, only pink Longchamp bags, which not only   incorporated the apple of my laptop, basically do not put other into a small bag of things   together even have won, including: notebook, maps, keys, or even the next day I   went to the fitness center, exercise clothing. It is durable, can hold, color   variety, cool Gouxuan, and do not, can have folded and placed handbag, very   easy, no wonder Paris, regardless of status, regardless of color, a staff Longchamp handbags, there is simply “French Country Package” status. Price is also very approachable,   a little big nylon bag in general more than two thousand dollars, Longchamp   Tote this large only in the thousands up and down, quite a bargain. Look like good-looking, durable   good equipment, and inexpensive, brand impact is large enough … enough …   really, you have no reason not to do with a Longchamp

blog comments powered by Disqus